One agenda item for the February 10, 2015 Oakland Township Board meeting will be a request to pay an engineering firm $9,675 for a storm water management plan that is legally required from Oakland Township. The need for this expenditure has its ‘roots’ in an unauthorized unilateral decision that Supervisor Gonser made in May of 2013, when he authorized one of our Township Attorneys, Charlie Dunn, to request a “termination of certificate of coverage for a general storm water management permit”.
This request is currently under litigation between the Township and the governing environmental bodies, and has never been disclosed to the public. The Township is still required to provide the storm water management plan while the issue is being resolved in the courts, hence the need for the plan.
Former Trustee Keyes pointed out the unauthorized request at the October 22, 2013 meeting when she became aware of it. None of the other Trustees supported her when she questioned the unauthorized decision by Gonser.
There are many issues associated with this matter:
- The decision to terminate Oakland Township’s participation in the storm water management program was made without Board approval and outside any public meeting.
- Supervisor Gonser made efforts to prevent then Trustee Keyes from disclosing the unauthorized decision at the October 22, 2013 Board meeting.
- The resultant lawsuit, related to our request to not participate in the storm water management plan, has never been disclosed in a public forum.
- The legal expense for the lawsuit is unnecessary, and is the result of a recommendation from our Township’s legal counsel or our Supervisor.
- The cost for the storm water plan is almost $8,000 higher than necessary if the Township had maintained their relationship with the Clinton River Water Watershed Council.
Here is a copy of the summary page that is part of the February 10 Board packet: (click on image to enlarge)
Here is a video of the October 22, 2013 Board meeting, at which Trustee Keyes pointed out the unauthorized decision. It was at this same meeting that she announced her resignation from the Board.
Here is a copy of the May 3, 2013 letter sent by Charles Dunn to the MDEQ without the approval of the Oakland Township Board.
May 3, 2013 Charles Dunn letter
Why is this important to the citizens of Oakland Township? Supervisor Gonser’s unilateral unauthorized decision in May of 2013 has resulted in legal issues between Oakland Township and the environmental governing bodies. The decision by the Board to not participate in the Clinton River Watershed Council has resulted in an additional $8,000 expense that was totally unnecessary.
The bottom line is that our Supervisor and Board have made decisions that are costing the taxpayers money (Engineering and Legal fees) that could be spent on other things needed in our Township.
Oakland Township has historically been on the leading edge of best practices in protecting our beautiful Township. Other communities looked to us as an example of what to do. Under our current Board, we are now fighting the DEQ, MDEQ and the Clinton River Watershed Council.
If the decision to terminate our participation in the storm water permit program was made based on a recommendation from our Township Attorney (who would certainly benefit from any future litigation as a result of that action), one must question the appropriateness and ethics of such a self serving recommendation.
On the other hand, if the decision was made by Supervisor Gonser, based on what he wanted to do, without any Board or public input, one must question his motives. However, his decision should come as no surprise to the residents, given his expressed opinion on environmental issues as previously reported on this website.
Gonser finally expresses his thoughts on UN conspiracy
The Board has resolved to enforce our ordinance 97 which has always made it clear that Gonser has never possessed the legal authority for these unilateral actions. This is a clearly a case on which the Board should act and put some muscle behind their words. Gonser ignored the law, caused public harm and should be investigated.
He has wasted our money.
He fraudulently used powers that he did not possess.
He abused his public office.
He should be publicly censured by the Board.
There is a lot more to this story than has been revealed, even in this post. The entire board and the two new Trustees especially, (as they can be the most objective on this issue since they were not sitting members when this was initiated), need to get to the bottom of what was initiated “behind the scenes” (and pursued completely out of the public eye) on May 3, 2013 and has continued for almost 2 years without any public disclosure, public board discussion or even an explanation and most importantly, a Board motion authorizing these petitions against the DEQ by Charlie Dunn on “Behalf of the Township and Board of Trustees” to the detriment of the Township, yet more litigation fees and now increased compliance costs to the taxpayers. This is yet another example of a poor decision resulting in futility, as the Township MUST comply with the DEQ by April 1, 2015. WHO authorized Charlie Dunn to initiation this action and subsequent actions unlawfully? Why did GMH pursue this without a board motion? How much have the taxpayers paid GMH on this litigation to Charlie Dunn and other attorneys within their firm to date in regards to these two petitions against the DEQ? There is MUCH more to this story.
Sitting Trustee, Board of Trustees, May 3, 2013
Had NO Knowledge of this letter or even who Charlie Dunn was.