At the September 22, 2015 BOT meeting, Supervisor Gonser made many allegations about former Manager Warren Brown. Trustee Ferriolo discovered that the Supervisor’s allegations were unsubstantiated. At the October 13, 2015 BOT meeting, Supervisor Gonser made a statement that was not consistent with what he had publicly stated at the September 22, 2015 BOT meeting.
At the September 22, 2015 BOT meeting, Supervisor Gonser made many accusations against our former Township Manager, Warren Brown. Mr. Brown was not present at the meeting to defend himself, since he had already resigned from the position.
Before making the many accusations against Mr. Brown, Supervisor Gonser stated:
“I wanted to express the disappointment I have in our former Township manager. The second week after he came, he asked the Supervisor if I would turn over all the projects I was working on to him, which I did, and that was the last time I spoke to him, or he spoke to me actually. The last time he . . . for a number of weeks.”
Gonser then proceeded to claim that the lack of progress on the projects he mentioned was due to the fact that we do not have a “strong Supervisor” form of governance in Oakland Township, a position both he and former Trustee Thalmann tried to change MANY times over the past 3 years.
Between September 22 and October 13, Trustee Ferriolo did some research to determine if Gonser’s accusations were true. After consulting with Township Staff, Ferriolo determined that Gonser’s accusations were not true. Trustee Ferriolo commented on his findings at the October 13 BOT meeting. He felt Gonser’s comments were “statements unbecoming a Township Supervisor”.
After Trustee Ferriolo made his comments, Supervisor Gonser attempted to defend himself. He said:
“Trustee Ferriolo was speaking somewhat beyond his knowledge. There WERE communications between the Supervisor and the former Manager regarding a lot of these project. They did not get done, so I am simply stating the facts. I stand by that! “
This statement contradicts what he said at the September 22 BOT meeting.
- Did he, or did he not speak to Warren Brown about progress on the various projects? Both statements cannot be true!
- Was Gonser just trying to defend his unsubstantiated claims?
- Was Gonser trying to ‘get even’ with Warren Brown, since Mr. Brown made the following statement at the last Board meeting he attended prior to his resignation?
“If the Supervisor cannot admit the error of his ways, fill the chasm, and become more malleable in his approach to his position, he should follow my lead. . . . To offer his resignation would be an act of service for the greater good!”
Here is a transcript of the accusations Gonser made at the September 22 meeting.
Supervisor Gonser’s negative comments about Warren Brown Sept 22, 2015
Here is a video showing a portion of Gonser’s comments at the September 22 meeting, what Trustee Ferriolo said at the October 13 BOT meeting, and Gonser’s statement trying to defend himself.
Why is this important to the citizens of Oakland Township? Supervisor Gonser has yet again failed to live up to one of his stated priorities when he ran for office. He told the League of Women’s voters that one of his top three priorities, if elected, was Integrity and establishing an Ethics Policy for Oakland Township. His most recent statement is yet another example of what many citizens have come to expect from our Supervisor.
There are many examples that make clear Mr. Gonser’s ‘personal’ ethical standards. The reader can determine if these actions meet their ethical standards. Here are a few (there are more that could be added). Each item is linked to a previous post that supports the statement:
- In April of 2013 he lied at a Board meeting when he said he had sent a letter to the Attorney General “as an individual” regarding a Blossom Ridge issue.
- In April of 2013, he stated, “There are policy decisions and strategies that must not be shared until after they have come to fruition.” So much for transparency!!!
- He did not recuse himself in a vote on October 8, 2013 where he personally benefited from the outcome of the vote.
- On January 13, 2015, he admitted that he had called and cancelled the televising of a very significant meeting when he denied having done that in a Rochester Post article.
- On January 13, 2015 he made slanderous comments against former Trustee Judy Keyes that he later retracted.
- On March 24, 2015 he made false accusations against fellow Board members regarding sharing of Privileged and Confidential material.
Do these actions meet your ‘litmus test’ for ethical behavior?