As discussed on a previous post on this website, the Township Board agreed to pay for Supervisor Gonser’s personal legal fees for his unauthorized efforts to obtain an Attorney General opinion on the Blossom Ridge matter. The results of the vote was 5 to 2. Supervisor Gonser participated in the vote. He was one of the 5 votes agreeing to have the Township pay that expense.
At the October 22, 2013 meeting, the author of this post requested Supervisor Gonser explain to the citizens of Oakland Township why he felt it was appropriate for him to vote on an issue for which he personally benefitted. He refused to disclose his reason in public. He ended by saying:
“Fortunately, I do not answer to you!”
“This Board speaks through our motions”
“That order of business is done!”
The author’s question was raised on behalf of the citizens of Oakland Township. He DOES answer to all of us! His lack of action and comments reflect his arrogance and authoritarian style that has been documented in so many other issues on this website. The Supervisor’s comments clearly implicate the entire Board in their complicity to this unethical behavior.
Here are the video elements from the October 22 meeting on this matter:
Why is this important to the citizens of Oakland Township? If an elected official votes on an issue that he/she personally benefits from, it is a conflict of interest. Supervisor Gonser’s open denial to answer the question raises serious questions on his ethics and hidden motivations or “agendas” on other issues before the Board. Once again, this action is coming from someone who ran on a platform of transparency.